I moved
and now I'm in
Friday, October 22, 2010
Can A Fogger Kill Lice
Facta non verba: Arzu, the scourge of the economy
We thought that politics should subject to the economy and now we realize that it is the reverse ; said Mayor of the Palace and god of the wolf, Alvaro Arzu by threatening to return to national politics.
What you may not remember the Chief Edil is that during his presidency, the economy was so subject to political whims, which maintained the very high lending rates , they walked in an average of 19.37%, having reached 22.4%. This and politically mobilized capital is always scarce in the real economy to the economy of paper and created a pyramid investment papers, concluded in the bankruptcy that affected many small savers and investors.
certainly not known, the Head of City Hall, that the economy has a direct bearing on the meaning and significance of human actions which are then ratios and have purpose. The economy has to do with the media that people choose to achieve their ends, these people selected according to their value judgments. If one assumes that the purposes they serve the people and the means chosen to achieve those purposes have to be subjected to political power, have you afraid, be very afraid.
If Arzu come true that with which is threatening, in the sense that the economy must be subject to politics, would not be acting differently to Los Colom who wanted a central bank for social, precisely the economy is subject to politics.
So as a joke, people think Arzu says that sort of thing because it is an encyclopedic ignorance once said I do not remember who, but it is not. The says it is an arrogant, because it is believed the XXI Century Jorge Ubico, and because they can. Arzu really believe that he would choose better for people, and believes that "flat" means he would select would be even better. That this was its President in 1996-2000 and that is what municipal management. He thinks he is the captain of the ship, the pastor of the flock, the father of the country, the child at the christening and the dead in the funeral. Want the economy is subject to the policy is that the arbitrator will decide how to play the game . 
We thought that politics should subject to the economy and now we realize that it is the reverse ; said Mayor of the Palace and god of the wolf, Alvaro Arzu by threatening to return to national politics.
What you may not remember the Chief Edil is that during his presidency, the economy was so subject to political whims, which maintained the very high lending rates , they walked in an average of 19.37%, having reached 22.4%. This and politically mobilized capital is always scarce in the real economy to the economy of paper and created a pyramid investment papers, concluded in the bankruptcy that affected many small savers and investors.
certainly not known, the Head of City Hall, that the economy has a direct bearing on the meaning and significance of human actions which are then ratios and have purpose. The economy has to do with the media that people choose to achieve their ends, these people selected according to their value judgments. If one assumes that the purposes they serve the people and the means chosen to achieve those purposes have to be subjected to political power, have you afraid, be very afraid.
If Arzu come true that with which is threatening, in the sense that the economy must be subject to politics, would not be acting differently to Los Colom who wanted a central bank for social, precisely the economy is subject to politics.
So as a joke, people think Arzu says that sort of thing because it is an encyclopedic ignorance once said I do not remember who, but it is not. The says it is an arrogant, because it is believed the XXI Century Jorge Ubico, and because they can. Arzu really believe that he would choose better for people, and believes that "flat" means he would select would be even better. That this was its President in 1996-2000 and that is what municipal management. He thinks he is the captain of the ship, the pastor of the flock, the father of the country, the child at the christening and the dead in the funeral. Want the economy is subject to the policy is that the arbitrator will decide how to play the game .
Melina Velba With Santa
There is no such thing as a country's oil bill
Supposedly, the country's oil bill rose a 23.9 percent, but that's not true. This collectivization of consumption of fossil fuels is evil and now I tell you why. You pay an oil bill and I pay an oil bill. The government and all who consume petroleum products pay oil bills. There may be a summation of the amount of all individual oil bills, but that sum is not the country. It's yours is mine and the government, but not the country.
Collectivization is perverse because I feel that your bill is yours, and my bill is mine, you and I are responsible for it. And manage it according to our needs and possibilities. However, if the bill outside the country, claiming to represent the country would feel with some political authority to modify and influence the way you and I manage our oil bills that you and I pay according to our needs and possibilities. Those who claim to represent the country would feel the political authority to take away from you and me the responsibility of managing our oil bills and dilute the individual responsibility-yours and mine, in the political community and irresponsible that they lead.
If the responsibility was collective or all, would stand still for anyone. And if collective or all, everyone but you and I would have the last word about our individual consumption of fuel. And no matter if you can afford, because it's our bill, claiming to represent all might want to decide for us and submit to his will as to our particular fuel consumption.
The same applies to electrical energy and photo-illustrated very well. There is no such thing as a power consumption of the country. Are you and I who consume electricity, and you and I pay our bills and are responsible for them. If we turn off a light bulb, save a little ... but you and me, not the community because the community is not paying your bill or my bill.
The same applies to electrical energy and photo-illustrated very well. There is no such thing as a power consumption of the country. Are you and I who consume electricity, and you and I pay our bills and are responsible for them. If we turn off a light bulb, save a little ... but you and me, not the community because the community is not paying your bill or my bill.
Be careful with the perverse idea of \u200b\u200bcollectivized consumption. Responsibility and freedom are individual issues. Not the community.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Black Spot Claimstimber Tech
lot, the exguerrilla desvincúlense yes I
During the demonstrations yesterday the group comprising members of the Alternative New Nation, of the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity, and the National Front clashed with another group composed of unions of various entities, including The Coca-Cola bottler.
funny thing is that the speeches of the occasion called for the unity of the left , but you already know: where two leftist leaders, there are three or four competing organizations. In part this is because there are too many interests at stake, and partly because between them they have not closed the wounds left by the betrayal, corruption and inconsistencies among them, left the 36 years of armed conflict.
In the ranks of the left many people intellectually restless, sincere and consistent, people who exguerrilla links with the eclipse, fog and becomes complicit in those 36 years of sterile confrontation, and the slaughter of hundreds valuable lives to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat. Those people
restless sincere and consistent looking good for the Guatemalans, albeit for wrong means that the principle of collective interests prevail over individual rights, they should be separated from the atavistic exguerrilla, angry, violent and totalitarian. They should be distinguished from them and separated them radically.
If that happens, the quality would substantially improve civic dialogue, and in such a case the differences of opinion as nothing more than honest disagreements over ideas complex , rather than a mythical expressions of class struggle can only end with the extermination of one of the parties involved for the success of the revolution.
This is a case in which the union does not necessarily force, and to the left you should disassociate honored the memories of the exguerrilla and their propensity for violence and totalitarianism. 
During the demonstrations yesterday the group comprising members of the Alternative New Nation, of the Guatemalan National Revolutionary Unity, and the National Front clashed with another group composed of unions of various entities, including The Coca-Cola bottler.
funny thing is that the speeches of the occasion called for the unity of the left , but you already know: where two leftist leaders, there are three or four competing organizations. In part this is because there are too many interests at stake, and partly because between them they have not closed the wounds left by the betrayal, corruption and inconsistencies among them, left the 36 years of armed conflict.
In the ranks of the left many people intellectually restless, sincere and consistent, people who exguerrilla links with the eclipse, fog and becomes complicit in those 36 years of sterile confrontation, and the slaughter of hundreds valuable lives to establish the dictatorship of the proletariat. Those people
restless sincere and consistent looking good for the Guatemalans, albeit for wrong means that the principle of collective interests prevail over individual rights, they should be separated from the atavistic exguerrilla, angry, violent and totalitarian. They should be distinguished from them and separated them radically.
If that happens, the quality would substantially improve civic dialogue, and in such a case the differences of opinion as nothing more than honest disagreements over ideas complex , rather than a mythical expressions of class struggle can only end with the extermination of one of the parties involved for the success of the revolution.
This is a case in which the union does not necessarily force, and to the left you should disassociate honored the memories of the exguerrilla and their propensity for violence and totalitarianism.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)